∴
…
…
…
A global hive-mind and agent provocateur focused on changing perceived flaws in Western consumer culture, economics, politics, art and design. Adbusters Magazine was a meta-critic and a consortium of thought. Influenced by the likes of Whole Earth Catalog, Mother Jones and Utne Reader, up sprung a dark and thorny sapling that stoked controversial branch movements. Adbusters promptly outgrew its namesake as it went on to establish a virtue-signaling media foundation. It scribbled mental graffiti on Vice Media’s blueprint, and broadcasted itself as a cultural revolution-based business to defeat other, mainstream businesses. It marketed a form of watch-doggery and wanted to sell you a new “happening.” In the world of ideas, Adbusters provoked a hornet’s nest of post-modern contemplation, but also spent considerable effort to fight back the undeclared bankruptcy of its primary goals. It was a carnival of resistance. They called themselves a catalyst, the pie in your face that broke your composure, and proclaimed itself “one of the most significant social movements in the next 20 years”—20 years ago. They were frustrated yet unfazed by the rude fact that most of their fundamental gripes have persisted unabated and solution-free since the 1990s. The latest edition still yearns to witness a revolution come thrashing out of the deep woods with each generational shift, but has now pushed the forecast to 2028 or 2038, or as long as it takes to dismantle the status quo it despises. Adbusters from cover to cover shocks us with an unsteady examination of facts, half-truths and soft control fantasies, which doesn’t settle well with a large swath of the citizenry. So, naturally, a few things have yet to gain liftoff, but the staff stays woke and clever in the style of Don Quixote.
Occasionally brilliant and irrational in the same breath, Adbusters offered a hodgepodge of confrontation, boycotting, primal-screaming in the pouring rain and pining anxiously for a grand collapse. When you see Adbusters on the shelf at Barnes & Noble, you’re looking at the ghost of good intentions. From within that paradigm and pretense, it believes a phoenix might gallantly rise.
After 20 years, has Adbusters’ “business” as a font of progressive ire received any tangible dividends in the realm? Or has it settled on a cut-rate liquidation of ideas stretched across a multi-decade fool’s errand? How many ways are there to tactically run dreamy neo-Marxism up against American civil liberties, and western institutions? They’ll find out for you and report back. If they built a nation based on their central theme of “culture jamming” would they, themselves, be culture-jammed inside their own future utopia, having espoused it from the beginning? Once they became the establishment, and exercise their will to oppress, where do the original teachings to undermine and rethink go? And we’re supposed to let them take their turn as the “new overlord,” rule over us, and choose the limit of how far civilization’s allowed to reason beyond the rigidity of their own strict resistance? Adbusters strains to emerge as it triangulates a massive load of ideologue friction, static and cognitive dissonance.
…
…
…
…
Let’s set this section off with Adbusters’ greatest call ever, which it released in collaboration with Gerald Celente and his Trends Research Institute. In 2007, they described how the Global Financial Crisis—the harshest economic implosion since the Great Depression—would unfold, with near-perfect accuracy. Paradoxically, they could have made millions by short-trading corporate equities if the persuasion arose to “unscrupulously” act upon the financial advice interlaced in their analyses. If only they’d followed their dour report into the stock market. Here’s a quick take:
“In 2008, Americans (and the rest of the world) will wake up to the worst economic times that anyone alive has ever seen. And they won’t know what hit them. Just as they were in a state of shock on 9/11, they’ll be frozen in fear when the economic 9/11 strikes at the heart of Wall Street.”
Several months later, boom, it happened. As fortunes were wiped out in the economic casino, Adbusters had just hit the predictive jackpot and found a way to effectively cleanse the mental palette: prognosticate from some place of knowing that others have yet to discover, take a risk to deliver an unpopular message, and wait for a lottery hit while continuing to tally a litany of other gripes across a full spectrum of the world’s woes and hopeless causes. Voila…maple syrup coaxed from a forest full of dry taps.
This was not a financial study that would be exploited for monetary gain, but leveraged as validation of a germinating neoclassical platform that promised to deliver ecological economics and true-cost accounting. These policies served a larger aim as Adbusters proposed a post-Keynesian explanation that is most applicable to a closed economy. This tied back to the theory that financial fragility is a typical feature of any capitalist economy. High fragility leads to a higher risk of a financial crisis. Adbusters wanted to redefine the three core approaches to financing firms may choose, according to their tolerance of risk. They are hedge finance, speculative finance, and Ponzi finance. Ponzi finance leads to the most fragility.
Alas, in the stream of its studied, academic brilliance, Adbusters often veered into sediment-clogged streams of navel-gazing, radicalized sorrow. Their abiding platitude: “Things are falling apart, species are dying, the air stinks, water is scarce, the climate is lurching out of control; winter is upon us.” They’re saying you will reap the suicidal whirlwind when you calculate the price after catastrophe or dysfunction has taken hold. Blame your government. In so doing, Adbusters rewards itself as “good” and penalizes the “bad.” Sometimes the magazine’s pages dissolve into a Hollywood-level rant, yelling loudly at passing clouds to break spells of silence and ennui.
…
…
Adbusters, serving tirelessly as one of however-many renegades of the True Cost Revolution, demands the following principles as upgrades to the capitalist system (else scrape it away and start over):
The overriding argument is that full-cost pricing is a way to redesign our global economy’s basic incentives in a relatively uncharged political atmosphere. Adbusters says conservatives would like it because it is a logical extension of their free market philosophy; that’s a stretch. Progressives like it because, cottoning to their aims, it involves a radical restructuring of the status quo—which they call dysfunctional and obsolete. Governments might like it because it gives them a vital new function to fulfill: that of calculating the true costs of products and managing our bio-economic affairs for the long term. And environmentalists already like it because they believe it may be the only way to achieve sustainability in our lifetimes.
So what is holding us back from this noble destination? Adbusters‘ elusive map might show the way.
And who’s the firestarter running the Adbusters organization? A totemic man who’s excited to draw up a hypothetical bill of rights for our future generations.
…
…
Hidden in Earth’s footnotes is a nerve-wracking realization that the whole of human history has led us to this imperfect moment. Such heavy thought commands an astute editor-in-chief to crank out an endless bi-monthly stream of magazines, 100+ well-designed pages each, because the staff at Adbusters is a lot like us—they have some grocery bags to fill and laundry on Tuesday. They have kids who want to breathe air that smells sweet, drink water that runs pure and free, swim in places teeming with life, and grow food in rich, living earth. They wouldn’t actually want to live in the naked jungle of anarchy and off-grid hell, but on paper Kalle Lasn—the founder of Adbusters—says a psycho-social apocalypse is brewing. He beseeches the people of today to not leave their dirty messes for others to clean up; do not take technological risks, however small, that may backfire catastrophically in times to come. He thinks your grandchildren have a right to inherit a world unsullied by toxic chemicals, nuclear missiles and waste, or genetic pollution. From an ivory tower in Toronto, Lasn daydreams about walking in untamed nature, feeling the awe that comes when we suddenly lock eyes with a wild beast. He believes this is the key that will prevent depletion, preserve the ecological wealth, in hopes that the human spirit will live forever.
He curses anyone who ignores his plea.
…
…
As a perpetually-evolving dissident dog whistle, Adbusters also subtly recognized that its mission may have been Quixotic, exotic and foredoomed. Self-aware, it knew how to see the madness in itself from every intellectual angle. In order to survive years of ideological stalemate in a world gone wrong, Adbusters dutifully swallows its own hypocrisy if it serves to alight a generational metamorphosis. Anyone seeking to shift the lode stone of the Overton Window would require such patience, would have to be able to laugh at its failures and take masochistic pleasure in long-arc delayed gratification that may never arrive.
Adbusters Media flogs about through weedy interpretations of Vaclav Havel and knows you cannot achieve 100% control over humans and, if you could, you could not go on doing so. It is—fortunately—too much responsibility for any human to assume, not that it keeps control freaks from continuing to try. Adbusters attempts to distance itself from their ilk, only to back itself into a hall of recursive mirrors in the process. Inevitably, the flaws of a nation tie back to our own flaws, where the blame game turns into petty self-abuse.
Bottom line: What is this group selling in the world of ideas? There are layered interpretations and synergistic tiers within Adbusters’ analyses. If you take every copy of Adbusters since inception to present day, read them front to back and back to front again, you’ll see the following leitmotifs and conveyances surfacing in the cult of Adbusters:
…
…
In no particular order, a partial list of Adbusters’ captivating vagueness and ineptitude:
…
…
…
…
Flaws aside, Adbusters did an excellent job of dismantling the counterculture and “hipsterdom” in its multivariate forms. It recognized the archetype of the useless American hipster as the absolute dead end of Western civilization. You’ll first have to admit that we’ve reached a point where counterculture has mutated into a self-obsessed aesthetic vacuum. So while hipsterdom is the end product of all prior countercultures, it’s been stripped of its subversion and originality, leaving a generation pointlessly obsessing over fashion, hollow virtue-signaling as a form of narcissism, and disrespect for most forms of authority. It promotes faux individuality, cultural capital and the commodities of style. Adbusters does a dazzling social service in fleshing the nuances out.
For high-IQ cynics and sarcasm: The triumph of the twentieth century was the invention of a whole new way of being—a new imperative of the self. So go ahead and express yourself. Be true to yourself. Enjoy yourself. Treat yourself. Find yourself. Spoil yourself. Distinguish yourself. Love yourself. Get some self-esteem. Some self-worth. A positive self-image. Achieve self-awareness. And self-sufficiency. Do self-improvement. Some self-exploration. Self-help. Blast yourself into the big glittering universe of the self. Measure it out in “me time” and your Facebook timeline. Welcome to the conformity of individuality. Population: You.
This speaks to the high-end aesthetic of preening, grooming cultivating self-worship with zero shareable content. It asks a frightening rhetorical question: Have we evolved for an environment that no longer exists?
…
…
Over-focused on the celebration of the self, have we now divorced ourselves from reality in a digital simulacrum? For 20,000 generations we have lived in nature. For only one generation have we lived in digital code. But the truth is people prefer to be in natural environments, and especially in savanna or parklike habitats. They like a long depth of view across a relatively smooth, grassy ground surface dotted with trees and copses. They want to be near a body of water, whether ocean, lake, river or stream. When you cut off arterial blood to an organ, the organ dies. When you cut the flow of nature into people’s lives, their spirit dies. It’s as simple as that. That proverbial hole in our heads is a kind of “separation anxiety.”
Don’t worry…no matter. Great achievements are being made, you read about it every day. It’s the information age—ring, ring. Communication. A global village, whether you like it or not. They want hit you at two levels:
1. A vision arisen from the tableau: People stand together on bedrock, hand-in-hand, absorbing information, collectively navigating a material world.
2. The reality behind the curtain: We sit hunched over as lonely individuals, nature extracted from nature, inert brains staring out into the electronic breach. On the screen’s glossy surface appears a reflection on the future of being human. The infinite depth of the here and now, the permanence of place and of staying put in time and space, has been liquefied. There is no place we can call home. Anything is obtainable, yet nothing is definite or solid. We have no master plan, alienated from nature and human nature. We are driving off the cliff into a virtual sea of unlimited possibility.
…
…
Adbusters is bleak. It frequently presents the specter of the world as a trash heap. It says now is a time to die. It suggests that if you have already dismissed freely your soul, you should die instead of staving it off as long as possible. The current year is a breathing cadaver, hooked up to life-support systems and an array of tubes, monitors and glaring lights. This is all something we are chronically addicted to. Tainted, we’re left to wonder how we would have done things differently. Do not resuscitate, and stop stalling the Grim Reaper. In the end, the sanctity of life is befouled by a desire to control and master nature. As we behold the metaphysical corpse, we sense that our actual, physical death will be seen as a sign of failure. Expose yourself to the scary, sad and fractured reality that nothing exists outside the dominant logic of capitalism, all which is about to crash. As if the American way of life was not negotiable. We’ve moved beyond sustainability, and beyond Earth’s carrying capacity—overdeveloped, overpopulated, and over-consumed. As if no one can break out of the consumer trance. Fear, to replace all joy. That is the challenge, and the aim, to take all of your brain and your power to track yourself into that life of endless fear. Adbusters says it has become clear that the ride is about to finish, and that we must have the courage to die.
…
…
Adbusters is wish fulfillment alchemy. Here’s what they want us all to believe: “We will design the next evolution. We will build intelligence into novel materials and liberate form from matter.” Under the hood, we get a soft whiff of myopia masquerading as resilience.
Adbusters asks us to find a “flow state” in Recessionomics. The editors are trying to explain it to us this way: Hedge fund managers aren’t jumping out of windows yet, but the outlook is grim, especially for those who are still ignoring neoliberal capitalism’s death knell. Instead of buying into the manufactured panic, why not embrace the opportunities afforded by the collapse? Being turbo-broke or orphaned by an outmoded system not only inspires some of us to live more creatively, it also offers a humbling chance to re-evaluate our obsession with money and our abilities to innovate. Did we get too comfy, expecting the cavalry to swoop in and save the day?
Adbusters sees war everywhere. It eagerly hooks its critiques into many facets of unrestricted war. First, the military kind: atomic warfare, conventional warfare, bio-chemical warfare, ecological warfare, space warfare, electronic/digital warfare, guerilla warfare, terrorist warfare. Second, the trans-military kind: diplomatic, warfare, network warfare, intelligence warfare, psychological warfare, tactical warfare, smuggling warfare, drug warfare, and virtual warfare (deterrence). Third and last of all, we have the non-military kind: financial warfare, trade warfare, resources warfare, economic aid warfare, regulatory warfare, sanction warfare, media warfare and ideological warfare. Limitless! Where would Adbusters be without its sublime devotion to disaster porn?
Echoing the greatest thinkers and ideas of all time, I appreciate the post-modern way Adbusters wants you to wonder what your mind is actually doing. The brain—what is it for? Is it a rational machine; the greatest calculator in all of creation? Or is it a device designed—intentionally or not—for creating meaning?
…
…
In the badlands of bitter irony, Adbusters is perpetually on the verge of going out of business. It cannot sell stuff or it loses credibility, yet it does manufacture its own goods and seeks subscription/donation-based profits. Simultaneously, it refuses advertising on ideological grounds. There’s a feral paradox for them to live off the grid vs. living on the grid. They prefer to ignore the fact that, whether you like it or not, people don’t pay for culture. Advertising pays for culture.
As the novelty wears off and the message sinks in, Adbusters can be shunned as it begins to waste your time. It does not require a lifelong immersion. Eventually you’ll see how a swarm of ideas descends into a blender/compressor, with un-assembled mental wreckage spewed into a vortex on the other side of the contraption.
Adbusters is a for-profit, capitalist media business run by individuals who believe, at best, they are changing the world (and at worst are manipulating the West’s youth into inaction via “mental counter-action” for profit). Once I reached my limit, I halted the subscription (in 2016), but still browse the newsstand edition as part of a balanced “media diet” that spans the full ideological spectrum. Increasingly, this magazine is like sugar and other empty calories: “Use Sparingly.”
In playing devil’s advocate and ignoring all silver linings: Adbusters Media is a mockery of itself. It’s exploitation of emotional stress caused by establishing a guilt-stricken ethos of “us vs. them.”
…
…
Through prolonged volleys of research, it becomes clear that the answers are never found in any one place. But perhaps John Steinbeck said it best, long before Adbusters arrived on the scene:
“I have named the destroyers of nations: comfort, plenty, and security—out of which grow a bored and slothful cynicism, in which rebellion against the world as it is, and myself as I am, are submerged in listless self-satisfaction.”
Steinbeck’s navel-gazing is on a completely higher level, well told and cut loose over the faults of eons. On an vast scale we’ve detected our endless yearning to see why there is something instead of nothing, to figure out what happened before the Big Bang. And we’re supposed to gravely contemplate how we can prevent the USA from declining too quickly?
In the end, Adbusters says a lot about our inability to process change and absorb the rapid evolution of technology. It’s a place most of us do not want to go into. And as Marshall McLuhan said decades ago, and which still rings true today:
“In this electronic age we see ourselves being translated more and more into the form of information, moving toward the technological extension of consciousness.”
What does it mean? For all the talk about the environment, politics, etc., these days, human beings have never been more distanced from nature. And as much as I hate to say it, I don’t think this trend is going to reverse itself. It now seems inevitable that people are going to continue to live more and more through technology. The gene-based, corporeal life we are familiar with might just be the incipient stage of an evolutionary development of “universal intelligence,” and you cannot opt out. You will be assimilated, subsumed, all while remaining transfixed and gazing into the pool of Narcissus.
Adbusters fancies itself to be that “final shout” before the absolute silence.
…
…
So that I don’t leave it on a completely sour note, here are a few positively-charged words from the existential prankster Terence McKenna, some 20+ years ago, just as Adbusters was emerging from infancy:
“Don’t watch TV, don’t read magazines, don’t even listen to NPR. Create your own roadshow. The nexus of space and time where you are now is the most immediate sector of your universe, and if you’re worrying about Bill Clinton or Michael Jackson or somebody else, then you are disempowered, you’re giving it all away to icons. This is shit-brained, this kind of thinking. That is all cultural diversion, and what is real is you and your friends and your associations, your highs, your orgasms, your hopes, your plans, your fears.”
Oddities aside, McKenna had a knack for elucidating what sticks with people who refuse to be indoctrinated one way or the other, left or right. The beauty in this is that it’s apolitical, and reminds us that our days are not unlimited. Even the conservative patriot understands the concept of “do not take their bait.” Hardcore Republicans and Bernie Sanders fans alike know it’s enough to drive a good man crazy, but those who can smell the rat know better. Social cohesion does not necessarily signify unity, nor does it need to. Break the curse…a house that does not change is a dead house.
Adbusters distanced itself from itself by saying a polarized, outraged populous is exactly what a corporatist economy wants. Be, and stay, pissed off. As a prime example, we know how the message of “The 99%” during Occupy Wall Street in 2011 was unifying. It created a singular purpose, cooperation, and positive validation, and it turned the spotlight on those pulling the strings behind the curtain. But we saw how OWS turned aimless and rapidly lost credibility. It shuddered under its own weight and meekly dissipated as the cameras and microphones slunk away. Putting everything behind turning 99%–1% into 50%–50% since then has served the powers that be very nicely indeed. It created a bigger fire than the one it was trying to put out. Blowback. Even the broader, worldwide Occupy Movement now sounds like a long-gone whisper carried off in the wind.
…
…
Understanding how rage and division is manufactured by both Adbusters Media and the elites they regularly attack, we’re left to living now in our richer and more palpable reality. You can begin creating a more authentic version of yourself while removing the shell that was most likely a bullshit version shaped over many years by corporate uniformity, Normie interactions and societal brainwashing. Indeed, the same terminal where Neo took the red pill to escape The Matrix. By normie we are also referring to the lowest-common-denominator “media landscape” that leaves us with a caricatured vision of society that filmmaker Adam Curtis dubbed HyperNormalisation in his 2016 documentary of the same name. Since the 1970s, Curtis argued, governments and technologists have given up on the complex “real world” and built a simple “fake world” run by corporations and kept stable by politicians. As a visual analogy, the Normie is like a computer construct in an early 2000’s PC role playing game, complete with semi-randomized pathing and limited dialogue trees.
Having faced up to this reality, you must then tackle the dilemma… you can focus your efforts on rebuilding a set of inputs defined by reason, competence, honesty and respect. This will allow you to build your own culture—a cocoon of intellect, camaraderie and humor that is able to observe the Normie clown world from the outside, if it wishes to. When you become your true self, you will be surrounded by others who still have their minds intact, who don’t blame anyone or anything for their problems, but like you live an honorable and joyful life.
Adbusters is but one of thousands of would-be guideposts running lateral to our endless journey toward authenticity. Choose wisely.
…